Feed on
Posts
Comments

Curing the Sweet Tooth

The temptations of sugary foods and sticky candies can often be too tempting to resist. The chewy treats get stuck in crevices and in the grooves and ridges of teeth. The end result is a favorable environment to create caries, or tooth decay. The prevalence of dental caries touches most everyone. In some populations, the incidence is epidemic. Water fluoridation has had a tremendous impact in reducing the incidence of dental caries. The fluoride ion binds with the enamel of the tooth and makes the surface more resistance to acid attacks that initiate the caries process. Unfortunately, dental caries rates continue to rise. The impact on the wide spread use of bottled water has effected the benefits of fluoridated municipal water supplies, as most filtered artesian wells that are the source of bottle waters and are often devoid of naturally occurring fluoride. Sealants are also an attempt to prevent the formation of caries in the chewing grooves of patients. But access and affordability to preventative dental care remains a limiting factor. The key would be to provide a solution that would have a minimal and low cost impact on dietary restrictions and life style, and actually taste great without significant effort.  Wouldn’t it be nice to have a sugar substitute that not only could reduce dental caries, but also prevent it?

Xylitol is a sugar substitute that is a naturally occuring compond that can cure the need for that sweet tooth.  Xylitol is a five-carbon sugar alcohol and is also a natural metabolic by product of the liver, which explains why it is safe for human consumption. Our bodies produce 15 grams of Xylitol every day. It was discovered in the late 1800’s but wasn’t until sugar shortages in World War II that it was manufactured in a crystalline form for dietary consumption.  Until recently, it was only found to be an ingredient in gum.

How does Xylitol work?  When sugar is consumed, it is reduced in the mouth and creates a lower caries–promoting pH.  Xylitol, however, does not create this effect and instead is accumulated in S. Mutans (the bacteria primarily responsible for caries), which inhibits their growth.  The result is, that consuming Xylitol stops the cavity causing bacteria from growing and significantly reduces the risk of cavity formation.  There have also be some promising benefits discovered beyond the mouth.  Xylitol can also reduce the amount of insulin required in diabetic patients.  There have also been noted antibacterial benefits associated with the body’s natural cleansing process.    Studies have also shown us that caries causing bacteria are often transmitted from mother to child.  Because of this Xylitol has been encouraged in the use of expectant and young mothers to decrease their caries-producing bacteria.

Too much of a good thing can also have an impact.  The recommended intake of Xylitol is approximately 6-10 grams per day.  Too much can result in gastrointestinal upset.  A common source of Xylitol is chewing gum.   Patients with tempormandibular dysfunction may also not benefit from the parafunctional activity of chewing gum.   Interestingly, although safe for human consumption, Xylitol is not tolerated by dogs and can be lethal.

For more information about the benefits of Xylitol and whether you would benefit from introducing it into your diet, ask your dentist or hygienist.  Dr. Scott Finlay is a restorative, family dentist in the Annapolis area.  His practice focuses on the comprehensive and advanced esthetic rehabilitation of his patients.  www.annapolissmiles.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Spring 2010 – Baltimore Magazine recognizes Dr. Finlay as a Top Dentist in the Greater Baltimore area.  Over 2000 dentists in Baltimore and the five surrounding counties were polled over the course of a month. An amazing 75% response rate was recorded for the survey. The results were then monitor by professional advisors to validate the authenticity. The poll went right to the source: dentists themselves. They were asked, who is the best in their respective specialty in the area. Only the top vote recipients were listed. Although Dr. Finlay has been perennially recognized by What’s Up Annapolis Magazine as the Top Cosmetic and Restorative Dentist, this is the first time that he has been acknowledged by the Baltimore Magazine.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Dental phobia, or fear of the dentist, is not uncommon. In fact, many people avoid dental treatments altogether, as the stress and anxiety can be overwhelming. As a result, the teeth are neglected and many treatments may be necessary to obtain optimal oral health. With sedation dentistry, offered at our Maryland area practice, you can get the smile you’ve always wanted without the stress and fear of your normal office visit.

Nearly all patients are eligible for sedation dentistry. While you relax comfortably, Maryland cosmetic dentist, Dr. Finlay and his staff can complete any dentistry treatment needed, often in just one visit.

For an oral sedation dentistry treatment, you will take a small sedative pill an hour before you come to the office. This will help you feel calm and comfortable and by the time you arrive, you will be very drowsy. During your dental treatment, we will be with you monitoring vital signs. Dr. Finlay will perform all necessary dental work and though you are in a deeply relaxed state, you will be responsive to any questions or requests. When the procedures are complete, you will be gently awakened and will have no memory of your treatment.

Dental Organization for Conscious Sedation (D.O.C.S) Dr. Finlay has received extensive training in the Dental Organization for Conscious Sedation (D.O.C.S) program, the premier resource for sedation dentistry. Additionally, his staff has been trained in oral sedation techniques and will make you feel safe and comfortable throughout your visit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Doctors and dentists can face complaints about pushing cosmetic treatments

By Rita Zeidner
Special to The Washington Post
Tuesday, May 18, 2010

When Carla Morelli made an appointment for a routine checkup at the Kentlands Dental Care in Gaithersburg, she didn’t request a cosmetic consultation. But that didn’t stop clinic staffers from offering up beauty advice.

First to weigh in was the hygienist who cleaned her teeth. After telling Morelli how much prettier she would look if she got her teeth straightened, she urged her to consider being fitted for Invisalign, clear plastic braces that would slowly move her teeth into place.

“Until she told me, I never knew there was a problem with my smile,” recalled Morelli, 39, owner of a Gaithersburg financial services consultancy. She pulled down her lower lip to expose a slight buckling of her front bottom teeth.

After telling the hygienist she wasn’t interested, Morelli said, she forgot about the incident until a follow-up visit last year, when several other staffers approached her about Invisalign. One said the braces would prevent her teeth from spreading and head off more-serious mouth and gum problems.

Morelli briefly considered making the investment, which averages $5,000. But because no dentist she had seen elsewhere had told her she needed braces — nor, in fact, did the dentist she saw at Kentlands — she began to get annoyed. Rather than a patient getting advice, she felt like a customer being pressured.

“The staff just seemed programmed to talk about Invisalign,” she said.

She became even more irritated when several of her own employees said they had been pressed to look into Invisalign while having their teeth checked at Kentlands, the only nearby clinic that takes the insurance offered through Morelli’s firm. (It is not related to the similarly named Kentlands Dental and Orthodontics group, which is also nearby.) The clinic also advertises the product on its Web site, on its recorded on-hold message and in a flier posted on a street-facing window.

A blurry line

Concerns such as Morelli’s may become a common theme among consumers, as elective cosmetic treatments are increasingly available from the same providers whom patients turn to for medical advice.

Plastic surgeons are still the doctors most commonly associated with purely cosmetic treatments such as Botox injections, facelifts and tummy tucks. But similar elective procedures — which generally aren’t covered by insurance — are being offered by a wide variety of specialists. Many dermatologists, who treat patients for skin cancer and other diseases, also promote treatments to smooth wrinkles, lighten age spots and remove hair. Otolarnygologists, who care for patients with conditions of the ear, nose and throat, commonly perform nose jobs, brow lifts and eyelid surgery.

Teeth whitening, veneers and Invisalign, along with more painful and costly gum surgery, are among the treatments many dentists and periodontists promote for adults as part of a “smile makeover.”

Of course, just because a treatment has cosmetic benefits doesn’t mean that it isn’t medically beneficial or that it won’t be covered by insurance. Breast augmentation, for example, may be covered by insurance following a partial mastectomy, but not if you’re healthy and just want to increase your cup size. Similarly, insurance may pay for surgery if your droopy lids are getting in the way of your vision, not if you simply want to look younger.

Patients who don’t demand to know why a particular treatment has been recommended risk unexpected out-of-pocket expenses, inconvenience and unnecessary pain, said Kenneth Greer, a professor at the University of Virginia School of Medicine and the recently retired chair of the school’s dermatology department. “I would never say doctors are deliberately misleading patients,” he said. “But like with many things in life, it’s caveat emptor.”

Patient education

Several providers interviewed for this article said recommending products and services that improve a patient’s appearance, even to those who never asked for such advice, is part of patient education.

“Every single staff member definitely makes sure that a patient knows all their options,” said Zivile Balaisyte, the patient coordinator at Kentlands, the dental clinic that recommended Invisalign to Morelli. “That’s part of our approach.”

You don’t have to be a brain surgeon to understand why health-care practitioners might be interested in offering cosmetic services. Just follow the money.

Last year, Americans spent nearly $10.5 billion on cosmetic procedures, according to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, an increase of nearly 150 percent in the past 12 years. (About $4.5 billion went toward relatively noninvasive procedures such as Botox injections to smooth wrinkles and lasers to remove hair and erase skin blemishes. The remainder was spent on surgeries, most commonly breast augmentation, liposuction and eyelid lifts.)

In 2009, a year when many consumers cut back dramatically on nonessential purchases, the number of cosmetic procedures performed by members of the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery grew by 8 percent, according to a separate report. “With the aging of the baby boomer generation, I don’t think we’ve come close to hitting the ceiling yet,” AACS President Mark Berman said in a press release.

In 2006, the last year for which data are available, American adults spent $511 million on teeth bleaching and veneers, according to the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry. Cosmetic-related dental revenue rose 15 percent between 2005 and 2007. (That figure includes procedures necessary to protect or improve oral health.)

Crooked teeth may not bother many people, but they often signal the start of a more serious mouth problem, said Roxana Homayoun, an orthodontist and owner of Kentlands Dental Care.

Asked about Morelli’s concerns, she said: “Invisalign does amazing work for adults, and we recommend that to patients who don’t want to get [traditional] braces. You’re not going to die if you don’t get it, but it’s very important to have straight teeth.”

Periodontist Edgard El Chaar, a clinical associate professor at New York University’s College of Dentistry, said he began suggesting specific cosmetic treatments to patients five years ago. He maintains that it is what patients expect.

“Nowadays patients are bombarded with information about cosmetic treatments,” he said. “If you don’t offer these services, patients get upset. And if they are available but you don’t make patients aware, they ask, ‘Why didn’t you tell me?’ ” Still, he wonders if the approach is in the patient’s best interest.

“I’ve seen patients offered treatments [by others] that weren’t appropriate,” he said.

Motivated by profit?

There are few if any rules governing how doctors and dentists promote cosmetic treatments or make patients aware of their efficacy or risk.

Greer, the dermatology professor, said he has attended conferences where physicians described remarkable results from their pioneering cosmetic work. But when he examined their “before” and “after” photographs, he said, he saw little difference.

Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, said he is concerned that profits are motivating some practitioners to overstate the benefits of cosmetic treatments. “It’s a reality of human nature that if you’re selling something, you’re going to be positive about it,” he said.

In the absence of professional or legal guidelines, “it’s the patient’s job to ask questions, to ask more questions and then to ask more questions.”

Barbara Rappaport, an actress and professional narrator in Silver Spring, said she regrets she wasn’t more inquisitive when she made an appointment at the Dermatology and Clinical Skin Care Center in Bethesda to have a rash examined last fall. When the physician she saw offered to remove a small brown mark on her temple, which she identified as sun damage, Rappaport agreed but says she didn’t learn the treatment wasn’t covered by insurance until she showed up for the procedure a month later and was asked for payment on the spot.

“The first words out of the doctor’s mouth were to ask if we had discussed money,” Rappaport said. “When I said no, she casually asked how $250 sounds.”

Embarrassed, Rappaport agreed to go ahead with the procedure but immediately had regrets. Bruises, a common temporary side effect of laser treatments, left blotchy marks on her face for weeks. Worse: The brown spot is still visible.

Dermatologist Roberta Palestine, the clinic’s founder and director, said she did not treat Rappaport and was not familiar with the details of her case, because Rappaport did not register a formal complaint. But she said Rappaport’s experience, as described to her by a reporter, “would be very unlikely.”

Indeed, it should be easy to see the difference between the medical and cosmetic sides of Palestine’s practice. While medical patients report to a comfortable but run-of-the-mill waiting room, cosmetic patients are directed to a far more luxurious, spa-type setting one door down. There the floors are polished wood, the countertops stone and the lighting subdued, not fluorescent. New Age music plays in the background. Herbal teas are offered free of charge.

A two-tiered arrangement, in which cosmetic patients are treated to a higher level of pampering, is typical of a growing number of practices. “This one-stop is very convenient for patients,” said Palestine. “Many of our patients have both medical and cosmetic questions during the same visit. We deal with their medical questions and send this portion to insurance, and we deal with their cosmetic questions and this does not go to insurance.”

Rappaport said that distinction was not made clear to her when she agreed to the laser treatment.

In general, providers could do a better job clarifying for patients when the treatments they recommend are medically necessary, Caplan said. Distinguishing between cosmetic and medical treatments “is harder than doctors think it is,” he said.

Providers could also be more forthcoming about out-of-pocket costs. When asked whether a treatment will be covered by insurance, doctors typically hem and haw about widely varying coverage policies, according to Caplan. In reality, they usually know which procedures are covered, he said, “to the dime.”

Before agreeing to any treatment, he said, patients should nail down the facts about realistic outcomes, the risk of complications and whether the procedure needs to be done immediately.

Dental patients should demand a thorough explanation of “what’s going on and why,” said Annapolis dentist Scott Finlay. Although there are never guarantees, recent developments in two- and three-dimensional modeling give patients a fairly reliable idea of the likely outcome of a dental makeover and help ensure realistic expectations, he said. Patients should also ask to see “before” and “after” photographs of the provider’s work.

For her part, Morelli has decided against getting Invisalign braces. Her new dentist, at a different practice, told her not to bother because she didn’t need them.

“There is a difference between making you aware of a product,” she said, “and ramming it down your throat.”

Zeidner is a freelance writer in Arlington.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry

www.aacd.com

Scott Finlay, DDS of Arnold, Maryland Elected to the American Board of Cosmetic Dentistry

May 28, 2010 – Scott Finlay, DDS of Arnold, Maryland has been elected to the American Board of Cosmetic Dentistry, the credentialing authority of the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD). Dr. Finlay was elected to the American Board of Cosmetic Dentistry at the 26th Annual AACD Scientific Session in Grapevine, Texas.

“I am honored to serve on the American Board of Cosmetic Dentistry of the AACD. This is the premier organization for advancing excellence in cosmetic dentistry, and I am excited to help lead the profession into the future,” said Dr. Finlay.

The purpose of the American Board of Cosmetic Dentistry is the testing, analyzing, and evaluation of the services provided by dentists and dental laboratory technicians for the purpose of awarding AACD Accredited and Accredited Fellow status in cosmetic dentistry. Through the AACD’s Accreditation program for dentists and dental laboratory technicians, AACD members must undergo a three-part process consisting of a written examination, submission of clinical cases for evaluation, and an oral examination. Each individual must also attend a series of workshops as part of the program. While each part must be completed in sequence, individuals pursuing Accreditation have up to five years to complete the program after successfully completing the written examination.

Dr. Finlay graduated with honors from University of Maryland, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery and a GPR program at a Washington DC Area Trauma Hospital. He is an Accredited Fellow of the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry. Dr. Finlay is also a Senior Faculty Member of the Dawson Academy. He began his practice in Annapolis, Maryland in 1987 (www.AnnapolisSmiles.com) with a special emphasis on esthetic and restorative dentistry.

Dr. Finlay is a Fellow in the Academy of General Dentistry, Past President of the Anne Arundel County Dental Society and a founding member of the local Pankey/Dawson Study Club. He is perennially voted the Best Cosmetic/Restorative Dentist in the Greater Annapolis area by a jury of his peers. He has appeared on Baltimore FOX 45 Morning News and two other health television programs as an expert in dental esthetics. Dr. Finlay also the founder the Cosmetic Dream Team, LLC that locally serves as a community resource in all aspects of esthetics as well as hosting philanthropic events to benefit local charities.

The AACD is the world’s largest non-profit membership organization dedicated to advancing excellence in comprehensive oral care combining art and science to optimally improve dental health, function, and esthetics. Comprised of over 6,000 cosmetic dental professionals in more than 70 countries around the globe, the AACD fulfills its mission by offering superior educational opportunities, promoting and supporting a respected Accreditation credential, serving as a user-friendly and inviting forum for the creative exchange of knowledge and ideas, and providing accurate and useful information to the public and the profession.

For more information regarding the AACD, please visit www.aacd.com, send an e-mail to pr@aacd.com, or call 800.543.9220.

Scott Finlay, DDS practices cosmetic dentistry at 1460 Ritchie Hwy Ste 203, Arnold, Maryland. He may be contacted by telephone at (410) 757-6681 or online at www.annapolissmiles.com.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Inside Dentistry

Scott Finlay, DDS

Clinicians have better choices to conserve valuable tooth structure.

Direct resin restorations are often the ultimate challenge for the restorative dentist as a clinician and artisan. The culminating re sult measures the dentist’s abilities in patient management, smile design, and the understanding of the mechanical and physical properties of dental resins. Chairside, the dentist morphs into the laboratory technician. Resins, opaquers, and tints are layered as a ceramic artist would with porcelain. Today, there is no single direct restorative material that fulfills all the prerequisites for a predictable result: function, esthetics, and biocompatibility, but the combination of materials and techniques can produce a beautiful, synergistic result.1

In an environment of responsible esthetics, it is the clinician’s obligation to design predictable, functional, healthy, and durable restorations that conserve as much of the patient’s original tooth structure as possible.2 Historically, the tendency may have been to digress to heavy-handed preparations of the teeth with complete or partial coverage with ceramic materials. Preparation designs were driven by the clinician’s understanding and choice of materials, instead of by an understanding and diagnosis of the functional design of the system being restored and the existing conditions of the surfaces of the teeth that remained. Our antidotal experience has deepened our appreciation in the conservation of tooth structure. Restorations do not last forever, and clinicians need to weigh the consequences of the latent effect of removal of tooth structure.3 Essential to this approach is the preservation of enamel. The quality and quantity of enamel that remains significantly affects the flexural strength of the teeth and the durability and strength of the bond of the restoration.4,5

Contemporary development of ceramics and resins provide the clinician with alternative choices for a conservative design. The choice of materials is often influenced by the clinician’s experience and skill. The scope and magnitude of the case will also mitigate this decision. Admittedly, direct resin restorations can present a laborious, time-consuming effort. With proper case selection, however, direct resins do remain a viable option for a functionally durable and esthetic result.6

Technique Illustration

The application of direct resin for multiple anterior teeth is a valuable exercise in understanding of the nuances of micro and macro elements of smile design. Although this may be an infrequent restorative selection for many clinicians, simply successfully completing this procedure once will greatly enhance the operator’s ability to predictably complete indirect restorations. Appreciating the concepts of stratification and layering of composites will give the operator insight into the effects of layering ceramic materials and their optical effects, and understand how the influence of the contours and surface effects will help to ensure restorations that predictably emulate nature.7,8

A key element for case selection for direct resin restorations can often hinge on the risk assessment for occlusal forces. Forensic evidence of occlusal disease on the existing dentition will help to define the magnitude of this risk. The ability to move a patient to a Dawson Class I or IA occlusal classification will ensure the predictability of a case. A classic indication for this type of restorative solution is a post-orthodontic case that may exist as a Dawson Class II or IIA that can be equilibrated, with proper analysis, to eliminate any interference in closure to centric occlusion, with deterioration of the facial surfaces of the anterior teeth that support the need for restoration.9

Only after a complete examination and the assessment of the biological, structural, and functional elements can a restorative design be initiated. Model analysis and a diagnostic wax-up will help to illuminate the deficiencies in anterior tooth contours that require restoration. The esthetic examination, through a facially generated diagnostic process, will guide the operator through the essential elements of macro and micro esthetic design parameters. In cases where ultra-conservative preparation design is possible, the foundation shade of the remaining dentition will have an influence of the translucency of the layering resins selected in the restoration. Dental whitening provides an excellent technique to alter this underlying tooth shade, before restoration.10

The selection of resins can then be completed, based on the tooth structure that we are trying to replicate. Dentin is an amorphic layer of the tooth with significantly different optical properties than enamel. Enamel is an essentially transparent crystalline structure that acts as an optical filter over the dentin. With stratification layering of resins, our concept is to use materials that have similar optical properties for each of those layers that we are replacing.11-13 It is important when choosing the appropriate layering resins to do so before preparation. Dehydration of the tooth structure will greatly impact the perceived shade of a tooth. This is best accomplished by creating a custom shade tab, with layers of the anticipated resin in the thicknesses that seem appropriate. Evaluating the cured appearance of the custom shade tab adjacent to the naturally hydrated teeth with which the operator is attempting to harmonize will help ensure the most natural result. Once this shade formulation is discovered, it is critical for the operator to have confidence in it and trust it. The tendency is, during the clinical layering of resin, to begin to modify that formulation based on the appearance at the time of application, which is a visually inaccurate reference to the teeth relative to their naturally hydrated state.14,15

Preparation design is dictated by the inadequacies of the current tooth structure relative to contour, discolorations, and composition. Preparation depths of 0.3 mm to 0.5 mm may be considered reasonable, but may include areas of no preparation because of deficiencies in tooth contour, or more preparation due to previously existing restorations, discoloration, or excessive tooth contour. Resins can then be layered and contoured as desired.16

Contouring, finishing, and polishing resin restorations can often be the greatest challenge. After tremendous effort in design, preparation, and application of the resin, the result can fall short by the elimination of critical line angles, morphology, and surface texture through over-polishing. With patience and experience, this can be accomplished to create a beautifully natural result that harmonizes with the balance of the dentition. One technique to visualize this process is through the use of diagnostic models and photographs. After the initial application of material and contouring, it is often beneficial to stop, take impressions, photograph the case, and reschedule the patient for additional detailing. Operator fatigue often leads to a loss of perspective and a less than optimal result.17-19

Analysis of diagnostic models and photographs give the operator an excellent fresh perspective on the elements of the case that need additional detailing. Observation of line angles, facial embrasures, and surface contours can be better visualized. The operator can then create a specific list of items to be detailed that can then be carried to the operatory at the patient’s next visit to be more effective and efficient in detailing and polishing.

Material Selection

Beyond the obvious parameters of shade and opacity that mimic natural tooth structure, the desired key properties for composite resin materials are strength and the ability to create a sustainable surface luster. In the past, these properties could only be met with a combination of two families of resin materials: hybrids and microfills.20 Hybrids offered the strength and wear characteristics that were required for durability and microfills offered the glass-like luster and translucency needed to mimic the enamel layer. The advance of resin science has launched the development of nano-hybrid composite materials that, through the management of particle size and composition, has given the profession a universal material that can meet functional and esthetic requirements.21-23

IPS Empress® Direct (Ivoclar Vivadent) is a nano-hybrid composite that meets these criteria of functional strength and esthetics. It is a light-cured, radiopaque composite, and is offered in 32 different shades and five different degrees of translucency. The interesting property of this material is the luster of surface finish that previously was difficult to obtain and maintain with traditional hybrid restorations. IPS Empress direct also offers the simplicity of stratification by replacement of tooth layers with a resin that mimics those substrates’ physical and optical properties.24 Figures 1 View Figure, 2 View Figure, 3 View Figure, 4 View Figure, 5 View Figure, 6 View Figure, 7 View Figure, 8 View Figure, 9 View Figure show the excellent results that can be achieved.

Conclusion

In an age of responsible esthetics, the onus is placed on the operator to provide a restorative solution that not only meets the functional and esthetic goals of the patient, but with a design that conserves tooth structure. Direct resin veneers can be a very conservative treatment modality to enhance the smile and restore the confidence of our patients. The frequency with which a dentist may perform these restorations may be limited in many cases, but the insight gleaned is valuable in broader modalities of both direct and indirect restorations. The advent of nano-hybrid composites provides a universal material that will meet treatment requirements in many cases. IPS Empress Direct is a unique system that possesses that attributes of strength, shade compatibility, and finish luster that was not as easily achieved in the past. With the understanding of occlusal concepts and material selection, a predictable result and a happy patient is a validating experience for the dentist.

References

1. Ardu S, Krejci I. Biomimetic direct composite stratification technique for the restoration of anterior teeth. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37(3):167-174.

2. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. II. Contemporary techniques and materials: an overview. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(1):17-31.

3. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, et al. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J. 1999;187(8):432-439.

4. Milicich G, Rainey JT. Clinical presentations of stress distribution in teeth and the significance in operative dentistry. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000;12(7):695-700.

5. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1540-1544.

6.LeSage BP. Aesthetic anterior composite restorations: a guide to direct placement. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):359-378.

7. Peyton JH. Direct restoration of anterior teeth: review of the clinical technique and case presentation. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2002;14(3):203-210.

8. Marus R. Treatment planning and smile design using composite resin. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006;18(4):235-241.

9. Dawson P. Functional Occlusion: From TMJ to Smile Design. Mosby: 2007;104-111.

10.Denehy GE. A direct approach to restore anterior teeth. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):55D-59D.

11. Blank JT. Simplified techniques for the placement of stratified polychromatic anterior and posterior direct composite restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(2 Suppl):19-25.

12. Dietschi D, Ardu S, Krejci I. A new shading concept based on natural tooth color applied to direct composite restorations. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(2):91-102.

13. Terry DA, McLaren EA. Stratification: ancient art form applied to restorative dentistry. Dent Today. 2001;20(9):66-71.

14. Terry DA. Color matching with composite resin: a synchronized shade comparison. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003;15(7):515-512.

15. Terry DA. Dimensions of color: creating high-diffusion layers with composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(2 Suppl):3-13.

16.Terry DA, Geller W. Selection defines design. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(4):213-226.

17.Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42(4):613-627.

18.Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am. 1989;33(2):305-318, 210-219.

19. Barghi N, Lind SD. A guide to polishing direct composite resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21(2):138-144.

20. Pereira CL, Demarco FF, Cenci MS, et al. Flexural strength of composites: influences of polyethylene fiber reinforcement and type of composite. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(2):116-119.

21.Drummond JL, Lin L, Al-Turki LA, Hurley RK. Fatigue behaviour of dental composite materials. J Dent. 2009;37(5):321-330.

22. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(4):427-438.

23. Mahmoud SH, El-Embaby AE, AbdAllah AM, Hamama HH. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(4):315-322.

24. Antonson DE. Composite resin materials: nano-what? Dent Today. 2009;28(5):124-127.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Choosing the Right Dentist

Choosing the right dentist is a very personal and important decision related to your health. After all, an enormous amount of trust is placed in this individual to be the guardian of your dental health. In addition to the aptitude to properly diagnose and make treatment recommendations, this professional needs to be able to perform these procedures with expertise, skill and finesse. How can you make a choice amongst the many accessible doctors with DDS at the end of their name?

Here are some recommendations in gathering information to help make this important selection:

•Contact friends and family and ask who their dentist is and what their experiences are.
•If you are looking for a general or cosmetic dentist, contact other dental specialists (such as an oral surgeon, orthodontist or periodontist) and ask for a referral.  Ask for the best in your area, who they would seek care from if they had an immediate concern.
•Call perspective offices and ask questions about the types of dentistry that the practice provides.  Is the staff member friendly and inviting?  Are they willing to take the time to answer your questions?
•Set up a visit to the practice for a visit.  Is the facility up to date, clean and reflect the professionalism that you expect.  Does the team enthusiastically support the doctor?
•Ask to look at photographs of examples of the treatment that the doctor has completed.
•Has the doctor made a career commitment to continuing education?  Is he passionate about the care he provides?
•Has the doctor earned additional credentials related to his field of practice?  Have other professionals recognized him as a leader in his field? Some potential resources on the Internet are www.AACD.com and www.MyNewSmile.com.

Finding the right dentist is the beginning of a long-term relationship to help insure the health of your smile.  Cost and insurance coverage can often be a limiting concern, but always keep in mind that having something done twice, because it didn’t meet expectations the first time is always far more expensive, often yielding a compromised result.

Baltimore Magazine and What’s Up Annapolis Magazine conduct a bi-annual survey of practicing dentists in their respective areas.  Thousands of dentists are polled by asking, whom would you go to if you had a dental concern that required treatment?  Who do you consider the Top Doc in the area to be?  Dr. Scott Finlay is a general dentist in the Annapolis area.  Both the Baltimore Magazine and What’s Up Annapolis have perennially selected him as the Top Dentist.  For more information, visit www.AnnapolisSmiles.com.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

We have all heard the expression that “we can’t fool mother nature”. Does that apply to dentistry and what about porcelain veneers? Don’t they just make teeth look better?  How can they improve the health of my mouth?

Making changes to your smile without considering the impact it has on the health and durability of those changes is like putting up a false storefront without the building. The results can only be predictability disastrous. The teeth exist in an environment that is exposed to extreme temperature changes, caustic and staining chemicals, and hundreds of pounds of force per square inch. If these factors are not well managed, the results will be the introduction of disease (decay or periodontal infection) or fracture and structure failure. If what God has made failed, then what are our expectations of placing glass (ceramic) in such a hostile setting?

The concepts of true esthetics evolved from the principles of health and the potential to endure.  We are attracted to those factors in human esthetics that may be indicators of survivability and this is certainly true in the mouth.  If teeth are worn, broken, discolored or crooked; there is probably a very real reason related to health why the conditions have deteriorated.  Esthetics can therefore only be assumed to be a mirror of the relative health of someone’s smile.  If it is healthy in form and function, then it will probably be visually acceptable and be free of active disease and infection.  Esthetics is the feature of a great smile, but the true benefit is health, function and predictability.

When considering esthetic chances to you smile, it is first important to identify what elements exist that are not desirable.  The next critical step is to identify why these conditions exist before designing solutions.  It is only through proper diagnosis and treatment planning that predictable beautiful results can be achieved.  Modern dentistry is unveiling better techniques and materials everyday.  These advances hold promises of better results and esthetics.  The key point however, is to recognize that failures that are commonly seen in restorative and  cosmetic dentistry are typically the result of failing to diagnosis and plan, not the technique or material used.

So what is the answer?  The solution is to put yourself in the hands of a trained, tenured and credentialed cosmetic/restorative dentist that has the skills and knowledge to create a beautiful, predictable and healthy result.  The solution does not lay in products that are selected off the shelf like veneers or bonding.  These techniques may very well be part of the solution but the primary predictor of success is the synergy of a custom treatment plan that is focused on restoring the health of your smile and your esthetic goals.

Veneers can be a predictable and beautiful technique to enhance someone’s smile, but they need to be utilized only with proper diagnosis and treatment planning.  Dr. Scott Finlay is a Fellow in the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry and is routinely involved in the comprehensive esthetic and restorative management of many patients’ smiles.  He is also actively involved in mentoring and teaching dentists across the country those techniques that he utilizes to successfully and predictably restore beautiful smiles for his patients.  For more information about his practice near Annapolis, Maryland visit www.AnnapolisSmiles.com.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

We are going to Texas!

Our entire team will be traveling to Dallas in April to attend the annual conference for the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry. At the final formal gala, Dr. Finlay will be awarded Fellowship by the AACD. This is a prestigious event with leaders in cosmetic dentistry from across the globe in attendance. When Dr. Finlay was Accredited by the AACD in 2007 in Atlanta, we had a surprise in store for him when he received his award. Check out our celebration on this YouTube video.  We plan to out do ourselves when he receives his Fellowship!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

It is with tremendous excitement and pride that we announce that the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) has awarded Dr. Finlay the status of Fellow. The AACD is the largest and oldest dental esthetic academy in the world. The credentialing process has become recognized as the gold standard in cosmetic dentistry, providing a measurement of a significant body of work from a candidate, by a national group of peers that are leaders in the world in cosmetic dentistry. In the 25 years of the AACD, only 51 professionals have earned this status. In 2007, Dr. Finlay reached the level of Accreditation with the AACD. Fellowship represents the highest tier of accomplishment by the American Board of Cosmetic Dentistry. Dr. Finlay is the only dentist to be awarded this designation in 2010 and the only dentist in the Greater Annapolis area to have reached the level of Fellow. For more information about the AACD visit http://www.aacd.com/public.html .

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Older Posts »